It’s the one major part of the PC that’s still reminiscent of the PC’s primordial, text-based beginnings, but the familiarly-clunky BIOS could soon be on its deathbed, according to MSI. The motherboard maker says it’s now making a big shift towards point and click UEFI(Unified extensible firmware interface) systems, and it’s all going to kick off at the end of this year.The name changed from EFI to UEFI when Intel gave up control of the specification to a standards body. The ‘U’ stands for Unified, as in all vendors including Apple will use one Unified standard version of EFI.
The Unified EFI Forum or UEFI Forum is an alliance between several leading technology companies including AMD, American Megatrends, Apple, ARM, Dell, HP, IBM, Insyde Software, Intel, Lenovo, Microsoft, Novell, Red Hat and Phoenix Technologies.

Speaking to THINQ, a spokesperson for the company in Taiwan who wished to remain anonymous said that “MSI will start to phase in UEFI starting from the end of this year, and we expect it will be widely adopted after three years.”
According to the MSI mole, the first new UEFI products will be based on Intel’s Sandy Bridge chipset, spanning the whole field from entry-level boards to high-end kit. The company says that it expects the boards to be introduced towards the end of this year, and into early 2011. “We won’t consider UEFI as an expensive premium feature,” said the spokesperson, “but as a must-have for everyone!”

UEFI (Unified extensible firmware interface) is a continuation of Intel’s original EFI project, which was designed to replace the BIOS with a user-friendly point-and-click interface, as well as addressing many other troublesome areas of the PC’s legacy.Intel’s Extensible Firmware Interface, or EFI, has been around since the first Itanium CPU’s came out ten years ago. It is Intel’s more modern replacement for the ancient BIOS most PC’s use. EFI was designed to overcome limitations Itanium was sure to run into. BIOS based PC’s cannot boot off of very large hard disks. Seagate recently announced a 3 Gigabyte hard disk that will not work properly unless your motherboard supports EFI instead of a BIOS.
MSI has previously dabbled in UEFI in 2008, when it introduced its Click BIOS on a few motherboards based on Intel’s P45 chipsets. However, the move to UEFI is now starting to become much more important because of its implications for storage.
Last month, Seagate revealed that a UEFI system would be an essential requirement in order for a PC to boot from a drive larger than 2TB.MSI’s spokesperson described this as a “big factor,” explaining that the “default storage size for the general public is getting bigger and bigger.” He predicts that “mainstream notebooks will use almost 1TB of storage next year, not to mention desktop systems, so we need to move forward to UEFI fast!”

Implementing a UEFI system isn’t an easy job for motherboard manufacturers used to working with standard BIOS technology, though.The motherboard manufacturers had held off moving to UEFI because of the “huge resources you have to throw at it.”
There are a lot of issues to address here, not least the fact that a standard BIOS can’t simply be flashed with a new UEFI system. “A UEFI system is generally bigger than a traditional BIOS,” explains the MSI insider, “and most of the onboard ROM is not that big, so you can’t just flash UEFI into a traditional BIOS board.”
He also points out that “UEFI doesn’t support every board; you have to use certain code with certain motherboards.”
Motherboard companies spend a lot of time developing their own features and technology that distinguish their motherboards from those of the competition. If these features are designed to interface with the code in a traditional BIOS, then they may not be able to communicate with a UEFI system.
“The main difference between a traditional BIOS and UEFI is programming,” said our source, pointing out that “UEFI is written in C, rather than the assembly code used in a traditional BIOS.” However, he points out that this means that there’s much more flexibility with the code.CPU independent architecture, CPU independent drivers, support for GUID formatted hard drives instead of MBR which would allow for more than 4 partitions and larger than 2TB per partition.
BIOS will not work correctly with logical boot partitions greater than 2TB, and we are clearly rapidly approaching that limit. Dell already has UEFI for their server products with a nice GUI to their latest BIOS(They just put a BIOS behind it for legacy boot), same is the case with Apple products, props to them for switching to EFI at the PowerPC/Intel crossover.XP does not support booting from an EFI partition, so even if you got a new motherboard, forgot running XP on it. I believe this could finally give corporations and consumers alike reason to ditch XP.
The GUI part of the EFI/UEFI is only a tiny piece of what it is.
Compatibility with operating systems that support only BIOS
- Ability to boot from large disks
- CPU-independent architecture
- CPU-independent drivers
- Flexible pre-OS environment
- Modular design
According to MSI, there’s still a lot of work to be done on developing UEFI, but the company’s spokesperson says that the cost of implementing the final systems should be minor. “We think this is trend for future,” he said, adding that UEFI should be a “basic feature for all end-users.”
With 2TB+ drives coming out the sooner this happens the better IMO. And getting more IT departments to kick XP to the curb is a really good thing in my book.